At A Glance
- Multiple ethnicities adequately sampled, including oversampling of certain Asian and Hispanic subgroups as well as Black adolescents of parents with a college degree.
- Provides detailed information about diet and physical activity.
- Provides comprehensive socio-demographic information about adolescents.
- Samples identical and fraternal twins, siblings, half siblings, and unrelated pairs in the same household to study genetic versus environmental factors.
To collect data about the social, behavioral, and biological linkages in the health trajectories of adolescents in the United States (US).
Adolescents in grades 7 through 12 in the US.
Begun in 1994. Conducted periodically. Most recent year of data collection was 2008.
• Wave I: Conducted 1994-1995
• Wave II: Conducted 1996
• Wave III: Conducted 2001-2002
• Wave IV: Conducted 2008
• Wave V: Will be conducted 2016-2018
The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, a component of the National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services. Cooperative funding from 23 other federal agencies and foundations, including several additional NIH Institutes. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill conducts the survey.
Add Health plans to trace, locate, and re-interview cohort members in a Wave V follow-up during the period 2016-2018 to collect social, environmental, behavioral, and biological data with which to track the emergence of chronic disease as the cohort moves through their fourth decade of life.
The primary sampling frame for Add Health is a database collected by Quality Education Data, Inc. Systematic sampling methods and implicit stratification ensure that the 80 high schools selected are representative of US schools with respect to region of country, urbanicity, size, type, and ethnicity. Learn more about the sampling design. See also a summary slideshow on study design.
Wave I: In-School Component
Information was gathered on schools from school administrators. The In-School Questionnaire, a self-administered instrument formatted for optical scanning, was administered to more than 90,000 students in grades 7 through 12 in a 45- to 60-minute class period between September 1994 and April 1995.
Wave I: In-Home Component
All students who completed the In-School Questionnaire plus those who did not complete a questionnaire but were listed on a school roster were eligible for selection into the core in-home sample. This was a nationally representative sample of adolescents in grades 7 through 12 in the US in the 1994–1995 school year. Students in each school were stratified by grade and sex. About 17 students were randomly chosen from each stratum plus an oversampling of Black students who had at least one parent with a college degree. Chinese, Cuban, and Puerto Rican adolescents also were oversampled. Learn more.
Wave II: Follow-up of in-home sample that was in grades 7 through 11 at Wave I. Learn more.
Wave III: Follow-up of Wave I in-home sample with original adolescents (now young adults) and their partners. Learn more.
Wave IV: Follow-up of Wave I in-home sample of original sample (now adults). Learn more.
Wave I Primary Sample Frame
School Sample: Approximately 90,100 adolescents completed the in-school questionnaire in 1994-1995. School administrators completed questionnaires for 144 schools in 1994-1995.
Wave I In-Home Samples: Approximately 20,700 adolescents from the primary sample completed the home interview in 1994-1995. Approximately 17,700 parents completed the home interview.
Sample included 1,038 Black adolescents with at least one parent with a college degree and 334 Chinese, 450 Cuban, 437 Puerto Rican, and 1,500 Mexican-American adolescents.
Identical twins, fraternal twins, and half siblings in addition to non-related pairs, such as step-siblings, foster children, and adopted (non-related) siblings, also were sampled. The majority of full-sibling pairs entered into the sample by chance. This sample was developed to facilitate analyses that differentiate between parental/social influences and parental/genetic influences and analyses that assess the extent to which environment influences behavior. This special sample of twins and siblings was referred to as the “genetic sample.”
Wave II In-Home Sample: Approximately 14,700 of the adolescents from the original, primary sample completed an in-home interview in 1996. School administrators completed questionnaires for 128 schools.
Wave III In-Home Sample: Approximately 15,200 of the original adolescents participated in an in-home interview as young adults (ages 18-26) in 2001-2002. Approximately 1,500 of their partners also were interviewed in this wave.
Wave IV In Home Sample: Approximately 15,700 of the original adolescents participated in an in-home interview as adults (ages 24-32) in 2008.
Schools were selected with probability proportional to size.
|Name||Methods of Assessment|
|Disability (ADL/IADL*; cognitive; equipment use; general; movement/physical)||Interview/questionnaire|
|Education and occupation of parents/caregivers||Interview/questionnaire (adolescent)|
|Household income and economic assistance||Interview/questionnaire (parent/caregiver)|
|Household structure||Interview/questionnaire (adolescent)|
|Responding parent/caregiver’s age, race/ethnicity, and sex||Interview/questionnaire (parent/caregiver)|
|School grade||Interview/questionnaire (adolescent)|
|Teacher demographics for school (racial/ethnic and sex composition)||Interview/questionnaire (school administrator)|
|Name||Methods of Assessment|
|Length of time that reference adolescent was breastfed||Interview/questionnaire (parent/caregiver)|
|Mandatory school nutrition education||Interview/questionnaire (school administrator)|
|Number of days ate at specific fast food restaurants during the past week||Interview/questionnaire (adolescent)|
|Vitamin intake||Interview/questionnaire (adolescent)|
|Whether adolescent consumed various types of foods yesterday||Interview/questionnaire (adolescent)|
|Name||Methods of Assessment|
|Adolescent’s perception of neighborhood safety||Interview/questionnaire (adolescent)|
|Computer/video/television screen time||Interview/questionnaire (adolescent)|
|Frequency of performance of household chores||Interview/questionnaire (adolescent)|
|Perceived neighborhood characteristics (e.g., neighborhood crime)||Interview/questionnaire (parent/caregiver; adolescent)|
|Physical activity frequency and intensity||Interview/questionnaire (adolescent)|
|Provision of school physical fitness/recreation center on-site||Interview/questionnaire (school administrator)|
|Provision of school physicals||Interview/questionnaire (school administrator)|
|Reported neighborhood characteristics (e.g., income, poverty, crime, social programs)||Linked Census and other contextual files|
|Use of a neighborhood physical fitness or recreation center||Interview/questionnaire (adolescent)|
|Name||Methods of Assessment|
|Adolescent’s birth weight||Interview/questionnaire (parent/caregiver)|
|Height and weight||Self-report at Wave I. Measured at Waves II, III and IV.|
|Male and female physical/sexual development||Interview/questionnaire (adolescent)|
|Weight control/body image counseling offered at school||Interview/questionnaire (school administrator)|
|Weight information for biological mother, biological father||Interview/questionnaire (parent/caregiver)|
|Whether nutrition/weight loss program offered by school district||Interview/questionnaire (school administrator)|
*ADL: Activities of Daily Living / IADL: Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Data Access and Cost
Public-use data are available from three different sources: The Odum Institute at UNC, the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) and Sociometrics. Users may obtain the data from any source, depending on their needs.
Odum Institute Dataverse
For more information or to obtain the public-use data from Odum, visit the Add Health Dataverse page.
ICPSR distributes the Add Health public-use data at no charge through its Data Sharing for Demographic Research (DSDR) project. Public-use data are available for download from the DSDR website.
For more information or to obtain the public-use data from ICPSR, visit the ICPSR Add Health page.
Sociometrics distributes the public-use data for a fee. The data are distributed in a variety of formats, including SPSS, SAS and ASCII.
For more information or to obtain the public-use data from Sociometrics, visit the Sociometrics Add Health page.
Restricted-use data can be obtained from UNC by contractual agreement.
To apply for restricted-use data, please download the contract application and return to the Add Health contract administrator. Please see the Contracts Homepage or FAQ about contracts if you have any questions.
Public-use data are free of charge through the Odum Institute and ICPSR, and for a fee through Sociometrics.
Restricted-use data: New contracts: $850 (includes all restricted-use data through Wave IV).
Restricted data are distributed only to certified researchers who commit themselves to maintaining limited access. To be eligible to enter into a contract, researchers must have an Institutional Review Board-approved security plan for handling and storing sensitive data and must sign a data-use contract agreeing to keep the data confidential.
Due to disclosure concerns, geocodes are not available in the public or restricted-use data sets. Researchers may add contextual data to Add Health files by using the geocodes at the secure data facility at the University of North Carolina (UNC) or by contracting with UNC to perform a data linkage. Contact email@example.com for an Ancillary Study application and additional information.
The following restricted-use contextual data are available from UNC by contractual agreement:
• Community contextual variables based on state, county, tract, and block group levels derived from the Wave I, II, and III addresses. Contains information about respondents’ neighborhoods and communities, including variables on income and poverty, unemployment, crime, church membership, social programs and policies, and availability and use of health services.
• Pseudo state, county, tract, and block group variables that allow respondents to be aggregated geographically based on Wave I, II, and III addresses.
Learn more about Add Health geocodes and linkages.
The Add Health bibliography includes nearly 5,500 publications, presentations, unpublished manuscripts, and dissertations by Add Health researchers. See the complete list.
Chithambo, Taona P.; & Huey, Stanley J. (2013). Black/White differences in perceived weight and attractiveness among overweight women. Journal of Obesity, 2013, 1-4.
Lee, Hedwig; Harris, Kathleen M.; & Lee, Joyce. (2013). Multiple levels of social disadvantage and links to obesity in adolescence and young adulthood. Journal of School Health, 83(3), 139-149.
Boone-Heinonen J, Casanova K, Richardson AS, Gordon-Larsen P. Where can they play? Outdoor spaces and physical activity among adolescents in US urbanized areas. Preventive Medicine 2010;51(3-4):295-298.
Boone-Heinonen J, Evenson KR, Song Y, Gordon-Larsen P. Built and socioeconomic environments: Patterning and associations with physical activity in US adolescents. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2010;7:45.
Gordon-Larsen P, The NS, Adair LS. Longitudinal trends in obesity in the United States from adolescence to the third decade of life. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2010;18(9):1801-1804.
Niemeier HM, Raynor HA, Lloyd-Richardson EE, Rogers ML, Wing RR. Fast food consumption and breakfast skipping: Predictors of weight gain from adolescence to adulthood in a nationally representative sample. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2006;39(6):842-849.
Norton EC, Han E. Genetic information, obesity, and labor market outcomes. Health Economics 2008;17(9):1089-1104.
Harris KM, Halpern CT, Whitsel E, Hussey J, Tabor J, Entzel P, Udry JR. The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health: Research design. Add Health Web site. 2009.