Abstract

Citation

McKenzie TL, Moody JS, Carlson JA, Lopez NV, Elder JP. Neighborhood Income Matters: Disparities in Community Recreation Facilities, Amenities, and Programs. J Park Recreat Admi 2013 Winter;31(4):12-22.

Abstract

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Physical activity is important for children's development and their current and future health; national recommendations are for them to engage in at least 60 minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity daily. Most of children's physical activity occurs outside of school hours; thus, access to and the quality of community recreation facilities and programming are particularly relevant. Researchers have identified strong links among socioeconomic disparities, physical inactivity, and poor health, but a limited number of studies have examined how access to community recreation facilities and physical activity programming are affected by local socioeconomic conditions. In many low-income communities, park and recreation facilities may be the only place for children to be physically active outside of school; thus, it is important to understand the connection between community environmental characteristics and child use of facilities. We were interested in determining whether the characteristics of community recreation center environments would be associated with neighborhood income and children's use of the centers. To do this we designed a study to identify whether neighborhood income disparities were associated with recreation center environmental characteristics and whether those characteristics were associated with young children's use of the center. We believed that findings to these questions could inform policy decisions within recreation centers and recreation departments to improve equity, facility use, and levels of physical activity. Thirty community recreation centers and 541 nearby families with children aged 5-8 years in five cities in Southern California participated in the study. To generate data we used multiple research instrumentation including (a) a structured physical activity survey of program offerings and barriers to children's participation in physical activity at the center [completed by recreation center supervisors], (b) direct observation of the presence and condition of recreation center facilities and amenities by trained assessors, and (c) a parent questionnaire on child use of the center. Results indicated that the condition of the community center facilities and amenities, but not their number, was positively related to neighborhood income (p < .05). As well, the number of cost-free, but not total, youth physical activity programs was inversely associated with neighborhood income (p < .05). Parent's report of their children using centers was positively associated with the number of amenities observed there (p < .05). The results suggest that policy makers and community recreation center staff should consider both neighborhood economic issues and environmental characteristics in their efforts to promote children's physical activity at recreation centers.

Full Text

not available

At A Glance

Physical Activity Environment Variables

# Type of Environment/Location
30Recreational Facility/Area
# Scale
-Neighborhood
Measure objective perceived
Crime/Safety
Pedestrian/Traffic Safety
Cycling Infrastructure
Facility Adequacy/Appeal or Quality
Facility Access/Availablity/Proximity
Aesthetics/Beautification
Population/Housing Density
Pedestrian Infrastructure
Physical activity programs
Open Space/Greenness

Domain(s)

Physical Activity Environment

Measure Type

Audit tool

Measure Availability

Not reported

Number of Items

Not reported

Study location

Metro/Urban

San Diego County, California, USA

Languages

English

Information about Development of Measure

The Recreation Facility Audit Tool was adapted from the Physical activity Resource Assessment (PARA) that had shown differences in a variety of physical activity resources in low- and high-income neighborhoods.

Study Design

Study Participants

Age

2 - 5 Years

6 - 11 Years

Sex

Female

Male

Race/Ethnicity

Not reported

Predominantly Low-income/Low-SES

Not reported

Sample Size

18

Study Design

Design Type

Validation/Reliability

Descriptive

Correlational/Observational

Health Outcomes Assessed

None

Obesity Measures

Not applicable

BMI Measured or Self-reported

Not applicable

Covariates

Sociodemographic characteristics (socioeconomic status, race)

Data Reported on Race/Ethnicity

Not applicable

Data Reported on SES

Quantitative data for community or area

SES-related Variables

Income

How To Use

Administration

Who Administered

Researcher-administered

How Administered

Direct observation, hard-copy form

Time Required

Not reported

Training Required

Yes, time not reported

Instructions on Use

Instructions on instrument use included in article

Data Analysis

Data Collection/Analysis Costs

Not reported

Data Collection/Protocol

Evaluators used the Recreation Facility Audit Tool (REFAT) as they systematically walked through the community center facilities while scoring the availability and condition of amenities and the presence of incivilities. Four evaluators underwent extensive training to use REFAT, and the first six centers were observed by more than one assessor to ensure agreement among them. Recreation supervisors completed a modified version of the Structured Physical Activity Survey on site via a structured interview led by the same evaluator. A primary caregiver with a child living within one and a half miles from each of the thirty centers responded to a survey item asking how often the child engaged in physical activity at the recreation center near his/her home.

Instructions on Data Analysis

Instructions on analysis included in article

Validity (0)

There are no validity tests reported for this measure.

Reliability (1)

Type of reliability Construct/subscale assessed Test/statistic used Result
Inter-rater Recreation Facility Audit Tool items Correlation (r) r > 0.9