Abstract

Citation

Rosenberg DE, Sallis JF, Kerr J, Maher J, Norman GJ, Durant N, Harris SK, Saelens BE. Brief scales to assess physical activity and sedentary equipment in the home. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010 Jan 31;7:10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sedentary behaviors such as TV viewing are associated with childhood obesity, while physical activity promotes healthy weight. The role of the home environment in shaping these behaviors among youth is poorly understood. The study purpose was to examine the reliability of brief parental proxy-report and adolescent self-report measures of electronic equipment and physical activity equipment in the home and to assess the construct validity of these scales by examining their relationship to physical activity, sedentary behavior, and weight status of children and adolescents. METHODS: Participants were adolescents (n = 189; mean age = 14.6), parents of adolescents (n = 171; mean age = 45.0), and parents of younger children (n = 116; parents mean age = 39.6; children's mean age = 8.3) who completed two surveys approximately one month apart. Measures included a 21-item electronic equipment scale (to assess sedentary behavior facilitators in the home, in the child or adolescent's bedroom, and portable electronics) and a 14-item home physical activity equipment scale. Home environment factors were examined as correlates of children's and adolescents' physical activity, sedentary behavior, and weight status after adjusting for child age, sex, race/ethnicity, household income, and number of children in the home. RESULTS: Most scales had acceptable test-retest reliability (intraclass correlations were .54 - .92). Parent and adolescent reports were correlated. Electronic equipment in adolescents' bedrooms was positively related to sedentary behavior. Activity equipment in the home was inversely associated with television time in adolescents and children, and positively correlated with adolescents' physical activity. Children's BMI z-score was positively associated with having a television in their bedroom. CONCLUSIONS: The measures of home electronic equipment and activity equipment were similarly reliable when reported by parents and by adolescents. Home environment attributes were related to multiple obesity-related behaviors and to child weight status, supporting the construct validity of these scales.

Full Text

The full text is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-7-10

At A Glance

Physical Activity Environment Variables

# Type of Environment/Location
647Home
# Scale
-Equipment
-Swimming pool, recreation room
Measure objective perceived
Facility Access/Availablity/Proximity
Social Environment

Individual Physical Activity Behavior Variables

Expenditure
Sedentary Activity
Total Physical Activity/Physical Activity Level
Behavior
Screen Time

Domain(s)

Physical Activity Environment

Individual Physical Activity Behavior

Measure Type

Questionnaire

Measure Availability

Download measure ( .zip )

Number of Items

37 Reported

Study location

Metro/Urban

San Diego, Cincinnati, California, Ohio, USA

Languages

English

Information about Development of Measure

The survey was developed from existing measures, previous research, and through a formative research process that included phone and in-person interviews conducted with children and parents. Wording on the survey was slightly different depending on whether the respondent was answering as a proxy for their child or adolescent, or for themselves.

Study Design

Study Participants

Age

2 - 5 Years

6 - 11 Years

12 - 18 Years

Sex

Female

Male

Race/Ethnicity

White

Non-white

Predominantly Low-income/Low-SES

No

Sample Size

647

Study Design

Design Type

Validation/Reliability

Health Outcomes Assessed

None

Obesity Measures

BMI for age

BMI Measured or Self-reported

Self-reported height

Self-reported weight

Covariates

Not available

Data Reported on Race/Ethnicity

Quantitative data on study sample

Data Reported on SES

Quantitative data on study sample

SES-related Variables

Income

How To Use

Administration

Who Administered

Self-administered

Third-party administered (e.g., parent/staff)

How Administered

Email/postal mail

Time Required

5 to 10 minutes

Training Required

Not reported

Instructions on Use

Instructions on instrument use included in article

Data Analysis

Data Collection/Analysis Costs

Not reported

Data Collection/Protocol

A test-retest design was utilized. The average time between completion of the two surveys was twenty-seven days. All survey measures were completed by three participant groups: parents as a proxy for their children between ages five and eleven, parents as a proxy for their adolescents between ages twelve and eighteen, and adolescents for themselves.

Instructions on Data Analysis

Instructions on analysis included in article

Validity (1)

Type of validity Construct/subscale assessed Criterion measure used Test/statistic used Result
Construct Survey subscales Body mass index z score (BMI); Physical activity (PA); Sedentary composite (SED); Television viewing time (TV) Linear regression (BMI) p = 0.84 to 0.03; (PA) p = 0.99 to 0.01; (SED) p = 0.54 to 0.005; (TV) p = 0.93 to 0.00

Reliability (9)

Type of reliability Construct/subscale assessed Test/statistic used Result
Test-retest Electronics in the home and bedroom survey scales, parental proxy-report for child Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) ICC = 0.37 to 0.96
Test-retest Physical activity equipment survey scales, parental proxy-report for child Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) ICC = 0.53 to 0.85
Test-retest Behavioral outcomes survey scales, parental proxy-report for child Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) ICC = 0.53 to 0.67
Test-retest Electronics in the home and bedroom survey scales, self-report by adolescent Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) ICC = 0.51 to 0.87
Test-retest Physical activity equipment survey scales, self-report by adolescent Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) ICC = 0.48 to 0.78
Test-retest Behavioral outcomes survey scales, self-report by adolescent Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) ICC = 0.63 to 0.67
Test-retest Electronics in the home and bedroom survey scales, parental proxy-report for adolescent Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) ICC = 0.38 to 0.91
Test-retest Physical activity equipment survey scales, parental proxy-report for adolescent Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) ICC = 0.50 to 0.76
Test-retest Behavioral outcomes survey scales, parental proxy-report for adolescent Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) ICC = 0.57 to 0.70