Abstract

Citation

Klesges RC, Klesges LM, Brown G, Frank GC. Validation of the 24-hour dietary recall in preschool children. J Am Diet Assoc 1987 Oct;87(10):1383-5.

Abstract

The results of the current study indicate that data obtained by the dietary recall correlate highly with the children's weighed food intake if a parent or the primary caretaker providing the child's food responds to the interview. Meredith et al. found parents to be poor reporters of children's consumption outside the home. It is encouraging to note that parents can be reliable reporters of their children's food intake in the home environment. When errors did occur, they were errors in portion size, as 96% of foods eaten by the children were correctly identified by the parents. Parents under-reported only 4% of the time. This slight tendency to under-report is consistent with other reports of the validity of the 24-hour dietary recall. In younger children, parents appear to be reliable reporters of their children's in-home dietary intake. As children become older, they appear to be able to recall their own intake both within and outside the home. There are several possible explanations for these findings. First, several factors could have influenced the accuracy of parental reports of the child's intake during the day that we weighed foods. Because food was weighed in the homes, the parents undoubtedly attended more closely to their child's diet. Additionally, the dietary recalls were collected at the end of the day of observation. This was closer in time than most 24-hour recalls and may have reflected less memory decay than usual. Also, since our sample was primarily middle-class families who were well educated, the correspondence between actual vs. reported dietary intake may have been artificially enhanced.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Full Text

not available

At A Glance

Individual Dietary Behavior Variables

Intake
Total Energy/Energy Density
Macronutrients, including Saturated Fat
Cholesterol, sugar

Domain(s)

Individual Dietary Behavior

Measure Type

24-hour dietary recall

Measure Availability

Not reported

Number of Items

Not applicable

Study location

USA

Languages

English

Information about Development of Measure

Nothing to add

Study Design

Study Participants

Age

2 - 5 Years

Sex

Female

Male

Race/Ethnicity

White

Non-white

Predominantly Low-income/Low-SES

No

Sample Size

30

Study Design

Design Type

Validation/Reliability

Health Outcomes Assessed

None

Obesity Measures

Not applicable

BMI Measured or Self-reported

Not applicable

Covariates

Not reported

Data Reported on Race/Ethnicity

Quantitative data on study sample

Data Reported on SES

Qualitative description

SES-related Variables

Not applicable

How To Use

Administration

Who Administered

Researcher-administered

How Administered

In-person

Time Required

Not reported

Training Required

Yes, time not reported

Instructions on Use

Not reported

Data Analysis

Data Collection/Analysis Costs

Not available

Data Collection/Protocol

Not available

Instructions on Data Analysis

Not reported

Validity (7)

Type of validity Construct/subscale assessed Criterion measure used Test/statistic used Result
Criterion 24-hour dietary recall-sugar Observed weight/ volumes Pearson Correlation 0.64, p<0.001
Criterion 24-hour dietary recall- unsaturated fat Observed weight/ volumes Pearson Correlation 0.56, p<0.001
Criterion 24-hour dietary recall- energy Observed weight/ volumes Pearson Correlation 0.48, p<0.01
Criterion 24-hour dietary recall- complex carbohydrate Observed weight/ volumes Pearson Correlation 0.66, p<0.001
Criterion 24-hour dietary recall- saturated fat Observed weight/ volumes Pearson Correlation 0.75, p<0.001
Criterion 24-hour dietary recall- cholesterol Observed weight/ volumes Pearson Correlation 0.75, p<0.001
Criterion 24-hour dietary recall- protein Observed weight/ volumes Pearson Correlation 0.63, p<0.001

Reliability (0)

There are no reliability tests reported for this measure.