Abstract
Citation
Klesges RC, Klesges LM, Brown G, Frank GC. Validation of the 24-hour dietary recall in preschool children. J Am Diet Assoc 1987 Oct;87(10):1383-5.
Abstract
The results of the current study indicate that data obtained by the dietary recall correlate highly with the children's weighed food intake if a parent or the primary caretaker providing the child's food responds to the interview. Meredith et al. found parents to be poor reporters of children's consumption outside the home. It is encouraging to note that parents can be reliable reporters of their children's food intake in the home environment. When errors did occur, they were errors in portion size, as 96% of foods eaten by the children were correctly identified by the parents. Parents under-reported only 4% of the time. This slight tendency to under-report is consistent with other reports of the validity of the 24-hour dietary recall. In younger children, parents appear to be reliable reporters of their children's in-home dietary intake. As children become older, they appear to be able to recall their own intake both within and outside the home. There are several possible explanations for these findings. First, several factors could have influenced the accuracy of parental reports of the child's intake during the day that we weighed foods. Because food was weighed in the homes, the parents undoubtedly attended more closely to their child's diet. Additionally, the dietary recalls were collected at the end of the day of observation. This was closer in time than most 24-hour recalls and may have reflected less memory decay than usual. Also, since our sample was primarily middle-class families who were well educated, the correspondence between actual vs. reported dietary intake may have been artificially enhanced.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Full Text
not available
At A Glance
Individual Dietary Behavior Variables
Intake |
---|
Total Energy/Energy Density |
Macronutrients, including Saturated Fat |
Cholesterol, sugar |
Domain(s)
Individual Dietary Behavior
Measure Type
24-hour dietary recall
Measure Availability
Not reported
Number of Items
Not applicable
Study location
USA
Languages
English
Information about Development of Measure
Nothing to add
Study Design
Study Participants
Age
2 - 5 Years
Sex
Female
Male
Race/Ethnicity
White
Non-white
Predominantly Low-income/Low-SES
No
Sample Size
30
Study Design
Design Type
Validation/Reliability
Health Outcomes Assessed
None
Obesity Measures
Not applicable
BMI Measured or Self-reported
Not applicable
Covariates
Not reported
Data Reported on Race/Ethnicity
Quantitative data on study sample
Data Reported on SES
Qualitative description
SES-related Variables
Not applicable
How To Use
Administration
Who Administered
Researcher-administered
How Administered
In-person
Time Required
Not reported
Training Required
Yes, time not reported
Instructions on Use
Not reported
Data Analysis
Data Collection/Analysis Costs
Not available
Data Collection/Protocol
Not available
Instructions on Data Analysis
Not reported
Validity (7)
Type of validity | Construct/subscale assessed | Criterion measure used | Test/statistic used | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
Criterion | 24-hour dietary recall-sugar | Observed weight/ volumes | Pearson Correlation | 0.64, p<0.001 |
Criterion | 24-hour dietary recall- unsaturated fat | Observed weight/ volumes | Pearson Correlation | 0.56, p<0.001 |
Criterion | 24-hour dietary recall- energy | Observed weight/ volumes | Pearson Correlation | 0.48, p<0.01 |
Criterion | 24-hour dietary recall- complex carbohydrate | Observed weight/ volumes | Pearson Correlation | 0.66, p<0.001 |
Criterion | 24-hour dietary recall- saturated fat | Observed weight/ volumes | Pearson Correlation | 0.75, p<0.001 |
Criterion | 24-hour dietary recall- cholesterol | Observed weight/ volumes | Pearson Correlation | 0.75, p<0.001 |
Criterion | 24-hour dietary recall- protein | Observed weight/ volumes | Pearson Correlation | 0.63, p<0.001 |
Reliability (0)
There are no reliability tests reported for this measure.